Developing an Anti-Xa-Based Anticoagulation Protocol for Patients with Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices.

Because of the complexities associated with anticoagulation in temporary percutaneous ventricular assist device (pVAD) recipients, a lack of standardization exists in their management. This retrospective analysis evaluates current anticoagulation practices at a single center with the aim of identifying an optimal anticoagulation strategy and protocol. Patients were divided into two cohorts based on pVAD implanted (CentriMag (Thoratec; Pleasanton, CA) / TandemHeart (CardiacAssist; Pittsburgh, PA) or Impella (Abiomed, Danvers, MA)), with each group individually analyzed for bleeding and thrombotic complications. Patients in the CentriMag/TandemHeart cohort were subdivided based on the anticoagulation monitoring strategy (activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) or antifactor Xa unfractionated heparin (anti-Xa) values). In the CentriMag/TandemHeart cohort, there were five patients with anticoagulation titrated based on anti-Xa values; one patient developed a device thrombosis and a major bleed, whereas another patient experienced major bleeding. Eight patients received an Impella pVAD. Seven total major bleeds in three patients and no thrombotic events were detected. Based on distinct differences between the devices, anti-Xa values, and outcomes, two protocols were created to guide anticoagulation adjustments. However, anticoagulation in patients who require pVAD support is complex with constantly evolving anticoagulation goals. The ideal level of anticoagulation should be individually determined using several coagulation laboratory parameters in concert with hemodynamic changes in the patient's clinical status, the device, and the device cannulation.

Management of aortic valve bypass surgery.

The 3 leading causes of aortic stenosis (AS) in adults are calcific degeneration of a normal trileaflet aortic valve (AV), calcific degeneration of a congenital bicuspid AV, and rheumatic AS. Therapeutic options in patients with severe AS include aortic valve replacement (AVR), transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), or aortic valve bypass (AVB). An AVB involves the placement of a valved conduit between the apex of the left ventricle and the descending thoracic aorta. AVB serves as a useful alternative to treat severe AS in patients deemed high risk for conventional AVR (ie, porcelain aorta, previous cardiac surgery) or TAVI (ie, severe aorto-iliac disease, limited experience, lack of hybrid operating room). Advantages of on-pump AVB include the avoidance of aortic cannulation, cross-clamping, and cardioplegic cardiac arrest. The procedure can also be performed without cardiopulmonary bypass. In this article, the authors review the circulatory physiology, perioperative anesthetic management, the role of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography, and surgical considerations of AVB surgery through 3 cases.

Early postoperative outcomes and blood product utilization in adult cardiac surgery: the post-aprotinin era.

BACKGROUND: Aprotinin was a commonly used pharmacological agent for homeostasis in cardiac surgery but was discontinued, resulting in the extensive use of lysine analogues. This study tested the hypothesis that early postoperative adverse events and blood product utilization would affected in this post-aprotinin era. METHODS AND RESULTS: Adult patients (n=781) undergoing coronary artery bypass, valve replacement, or both from November 1, 2005, to October 31, 2008, at a single institution were included. Multiple logistic regression modeling and propensity scoring were performed on 29 preoperative and intraoperative variables in patients receiving aprotinin (n=325) or lysine analogues (n=456). The propensity-adjusted relative risk (RR) for the intraoperative use of packed red blood cells (RR, 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57 to 0.99), fresh frozen plasma (RR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.21 to 0.64), and cryoprecipitate (RR:0.06; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.22) were lower in the aprotinin versus lysine analog group (all P<0.05). The risk for mortality (RR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.16 to 1.79) and neurological events (RR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.35 to 2.18) remained similar between groups, whereas a trend for reduced risk for renal dysfunction was observed in the aprotinin group. CONCLUSIONS: In the post-aprotinin era, with the exclusive use of lysine analogues, the relative risk of early postoperative outcomes such as mortality and renal dysfunction have not improved, but the risk for the intraoperative use of blood products has increased. Thus, improvements in early postoperative outcomes have not been realized with the discontinued use of aprotinin, but rather increased blood product use has occurred with the attendant costs and risks inherent with this strategy.

Combined carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass grafting versus coronary artery bypass grafting alone: a retrospective review of outcomes at our institution.

BACKGROUND: It remains controversial whether patients with concomitant carotid and coronary disease should undergo operative repair separately or in combination. METHODS: Patients with documented cerebrovascular disease undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) alone were matched by propensity scoring with patients undergoing combined carotid endarterectomy (CEA)/CABG procedures and compared for the occurrence of stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), and mortality. RESULTS: Of the 4943 patients undergoing CABG, 908 had known cerebrovascular disease. Among these, 134 underwent concomitant CEA, and these were propensity matched with 134 patients undergoing CABG only. No differences were observed in the perioperative risks of stroke (4% vs 3%, odds ratio [OR] 1.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.4-5.5), MI (0.7% vs 0.7%, not significant [NS]), or combined cardiovascular events (6% vs 10%, OR 0.5, 95% CI [0.2-1.3]), although mortality (1% vs 8%, OR 0.2, 95% CI [0.04-0.8] was higher with CABG only. DISCUSSION: Addition of CEA to CABG did not significantly alter the risk of perioperative stroke relative to propensity-matched patients undergoing CABG alone.

Twenty-five year experience with the St. Jude medical mechanical valve prosthesis.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated all adult St. Jude mechanical valve recipients at our institution since the initial implant in January 1979 and now present our 25-year experience. METHODS: Nine hundred forty-five valve recipients were followed prospectively at 12-month intervals from January 1979 to December 2007. RESULTS: Operative mortality was 3% in the aortic valve recipients and 5% in the mitral valve recipients. Follow-up was 95% complete. Among aortic valve recipients, late actuarial survival was 81% +/- 2%, 59% +/- 2%, 41% +/- 3%, 28% +/- 3%, and 17% +/- 4% at 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 years, respectively. Twenty-five-year freedom from reoperation, thromboembolism, bleeding, and endocarditis was 90% +/- 2%, 69% +/- 5%, 67% +/- 3%, and 9% 3 +/- 2% respectively. Among mitral valve recipients late actuarial survival was 84% +/- 2%, 63% +/- 3%, 44% +/- 3%, 31% +/- 3%, and 23% +/- 4% at 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 years, respectively. Twenty-five-year freedom from reoperation, thromboembolism, bleeding and endocarditis was 81% +/- 10%, 52% +/- 8%, 64% +/- 6%, and 97% +/- 1%. Freedom from valve-related mortality and morbidity at 25 years was 26% +/- 7% and 29% +/- 6% for aortic and mitral valve replacement, respectively. Freedom from valve-related mortality was 66% +/- 8% and 87% +/- 3% for aortic and mitral valve replacement, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These results compare favorably with those for other mechanical prostheses. After two and a half decades of observation with close follow-up, the St. Jude mechanical valve continues to be a reliable prosthesis.

Novel approach to management of acute pulmonary failure during biventricular assist device insertion.

A shunt from a right ventricular assist device (BVS5000; Abiomed, Inc., Danvers, MA) with an oxygenator to a left ventricular assist device (AB5000; Abiomed) was created to circumvent the lungs in a 16-year-old boy with acute pulmonary failure during the transition from extracorporeal membrane oxygenation to biventricular support.

Valve surgery in renal dialysis patients.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Mechanical valves are used in dialysis patients due to the presumed rapid degeneration of tissue valves. The study aim was to compare the results of mechanical and tissue valves placed in renal dialysis patients. METHODS: Information obtained from a computer-based valve replacement database, telephone interviews and patient charts was reviewed for follow up data. RESULTS: Between 1991 and 2004, 50 dialysis patients underwent left-sided valve replacement. Of these patients, 17 received 21 St. Jude Medical mechanical valves (12 aortic, nine mitral), and 33 received 39 tissue valves (19 aortic, 20 mitral). The mean follow up for the mechanical and tissue valve groups was 19.4 +/- 21.3 and 21.4 +/- 18.7 months, respectively. Mortality at four years was 65% (11/17) for the mechanical valve group, and 42% (14/33) for the tissue valve group (p = 0.15). Freedom from reoperation was not significantly different. The tissue valve group had significantly higher Kaplan-Meier freedom from thromboembolism (100% versus 75 +/- 15%, p = 0.01), hemorrhage (97 +/- 3% versus 44 +/- 17%, p = 0.002), valve-related morbidity (74 +/- 9% versus 42 +/- 16%, p = 0.043), and valve-related morbidity and mortality (69 +/- 9% versus 37 +/- 14%, p = 0.037) at three years. Linearized rates of hemorrhage (21 versus 2%/pt-yr; p = 0.005), valve-related morbidity (36 versus 12%/pt-yr; p = 0.02) and valve-related morbidity and mortality (50 versus 17%/pt-yr; p = 0.008) were all significantly higher in the mechanical valve group. CONCLUSION: Dialysis patients had poor survival; prosthetic valve degeneration was negligible. Incidences of thromboembolism, bleeding and valve-related morbidity and mortality were higher with mechanical valves. Linearized, as opposed to actuarial, analysis further accentuated the unacceptably high rates of complications and death with mechanical valves.